The aim of this research is to investigate the contributions of selected family factors to drug abuse among adolescents in Kenyan secondary schools. To achieve this, the study sought to investigate the role of parental monitoring, residence, employment and parenting behaviours in predisposing the adolescent in the development to drug use. In addition, the study established the significance of associations between family factors and drug abuse among adolescents. The data were collected from form two students and deputy principals in secondary schools. The findings revealed that lack of parental supervision, parental employment, authoritarian style of parenting and lack of open discussion with adolescents contributed to drug abuse as well as most parents do not take active roles in schools. The study further revealed that not residing with the biological parents was not significantly associated with drug abuse. This was contrary to the view held by most scholars that the adolescents who do not reside with their biological parents were prone to drug abuse. To avoid drug abuse, parental monitoring should be given to all children regardless of the birth order, absence of aggression at home, parental quality time, open discussions with adolescents, authoritative parenting and parental involvement in school activities. Majority of the children born after the first child portrayed antisocial behaviours; hence the further the birth position in the family the higher the engagement in drug abuse Based on these findings, there is need to give all children as much supervision as that given to the first born children. Thus, the schools should organise sessions for parents and educate them on effective ways of parenting adolescents. Parents need to be encouraged to take active role in schools. Therefore, schools must create partnerships by providing an open and accommodative environment with their wider community. This would help in forming a link between the school and the home as well as the school and the family.
Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11 |
Page(s) | 19-26 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Adolescents, Drug Abuse, Students, Parents, Schools, Children
[1] | Baque, V. F. & Roche, L.S. (2007). Comprehensive classroom management: creating learning (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. |
[2] | Bank, L., & Burraston, B. (2001).Abusive home environments as predictors of poor adjustment during adolescence and early adulthood. American Journal of Community Psychology, Special Issue, Vol. 29 No.3. |
[3] | Blodgett, E., Gondoli D. M., & Grundy A. M. (2009). The longitudinal interplay of maternal warmth and adolescents’ self-disclosure in predicting maternal knowledge. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19 (4), 654-668. |
[4] | Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development experiment by nature and design. New York. Harvard University Press. |
[5] | Bruce, G., Ana, D., Denise, H. & Ketith, S. (2009). Student-school bonding and adolescent problem behaviour. Oxford Journal, 14 (1), 99-104. |
[6] | Bushman, B. J. & Huesman, L.R. (2006).Short term and long term effects of violent media aggression in children and adults. Journal of America Academy of Paediatrics, 160 (4), 348- 352. |
[7] | Chassin, L., Ritter, J., Trim, R., king, K., (2003).Adolescent substance use. New York, Plentim Press. |
[8] | Christian M Connell, Emily, C. Cook, Will, M. Aklin, Jeffrey, J. Vanderploeg, Robert, A. Brex (2011). Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Patterns of Antisocial Behaviour among Nonmetropolitan Adolescents. Aggressive Behaviour. 2011, 37(1): 98-18. |
[9] | Erikson, E. (1968). Identity youth and crisis. New York. Norton. |
[10] | Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., Harnett, L., Jolliffe, D., Soteriou, N., Turner, R., & West, D. J. (2006). Criminal careers up to age 50 and life success up to age 48: New findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. London, UK: Home Office (Research Study No. 299) |
[11] | Foley, K., Atman, D., Durant, R., Wolfson, M., (2004).Adults approval and adolescents’ alcohol use. Journal of adolescents health 35 (4) 345-336. |
[12] | Gary, L., Bowen, C., Rosen, R.A. & Powers, J. D. (2005).Changes in the social environment and the school success of middle school students. New York: McGraw. |
[13] | Hair, E., Park, M., Ling, T., Moore, K. (2009). Risky behaviours in late adolescence: co-occurrence, predictors, and consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health. 45: 253–261. |
[14] | Humensky, J. (2010). Adolescents’ social economic status and alcoholic drug abuse: Substance abuse treatment, prevention and policy. New York. Prentice-Hall. |
[15] | Jacobson, K.C. & Crockett, L.J. (2000). Parental Monitoring and Adolescent Adjustment: An Ecological Perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10(1), 65–97. |
[16] | Nash, S., McQueen, A., Bray, J., (2005). Pathway to adolescents alcohol use: Family environment, peer pressure and parental expectations. Journal of adolescent health 37 19-28. |
[17] | Rangarajan, S., & Kelly, L. (2006). Family communication patterns, family environment, and the impact of parental alcoholism on offspring self-esteem. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23 (4), 655-671. |
[18] | Rugg, M. (2013). Teenage smoking behaviour influenced by friends and parents smoking habits. Eurek alert, Journal of Adolescent Health, 143, 120-125. |
[19] | Sailor, G. R. (2010).Preventing antisocial behaviour in the schools. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 28, 467-478. |
[20] | Scaggs, J. (2009). Effects of school discipline on students social bonds. University of Missouri Smith, C. A., & Stern, S. B. (1997). Delinquency and antisocial behaviour: A review of family processes and intervention research. Social Service Review, 71, 382–420. |
[21] | Siziya, S., Rudatsikira, E. & Mvula, S. (2003) Alcohol Use among School Going Adolescents in Harare Zimbabwe Tanzania. Journal of Health Research, 3(10), 11- 16. |
[22] | Sher, K. J., Grekin, E. R., & Williams, N. A. (2005). The development of alcohol use disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 493-523. |
[23] | Stratton, C. & Reid, W. (2008).A school and family partnership. Addressing multiple risk factors to improve school readiness and prevent antisocial behaviour in young children. Seattle, WA, University of Washington Retrieved from: http://wwwincredibleyears.com on 25 February 2014. |
[24] | Suniya, S. (2013).Problem with rich kids. Retrieved from: http://www.psychologytoday.com. |
[25] | Tebes, J. K., Emily, C. C., Vanderploeg, J. J., Feinn R., Chinman, M. J., Shepard, J.K., Brabham, T., & Connell, C.M. (2010). Parental knowledge and substance use Among African American adolescents: Influence of gender and grade level. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20 (4), 406-413. 3. |
[26] | Weiser, D. & Freud, P. (2011). Parents as role models: Parental behaviour affects adolescents’ plans for work involvement. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 35 (3), 218-224. |
[27] | Zhou, Q., King, K. M., & Chassin, L. (2006). The roles of familial alcoholism and adolescent family harmony in young adult’s substance dependence disorders: Mediated and moderated relations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 320-331. |
APA Style
Milcah Njoki Nyaga, Kimu Mwai. (2016). Contributions of Selected Family Factors to Drug Abuse Among Adolescents in Secondary Schools in Manyatta Sub-county, Embu County, Kenya. Science Journal of Education, 4(2), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11
ACS Style
Milcah Njoki Nyaga; Kimu Mwai. Contributions of Selected Family Factors to Drug Abuse Among Adolescents in Secondary Schools in Manyatta Sub-county, Embu County, Kenya. Sci. J. Educ. 2016, 4(2), 19-26. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11
AMA Style
Milcah Njoki Nyaga, Kimu Mwai. Contributions of Selected Family Factors to Drug Abuse Among Adolescents in Secondary Schools in Manyatta Sub-county, Embu County, Kenya. Sci J Educ. 2016;4(2):19-26. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11
@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11, author = {Milcah Njoki Nyaga and Kimu Mwai}, title = {Contributions of Selected Family Factors to Drug Abuse Among Adolescents in Secondary Schools in Manyatta Sub-county, Embu County, Kenya}, journal = {Science Journal of Education}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, pages = {19-26}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20160402.11}, abstract = {The aim of this research is to investigate the contributions of selected family factors to drug abuse among adolescents in Kenyan secondary schools. To achieve this, the study sought to investigate the role of parental monitoring, residence, employment and parenting behaviours in predisposing the adolescent in the development to drug use. In addition, the study established the significance of associations between family factors and drug abuse among adolescents. The data were collected from form two students and deputy principals in secondary schools. The findings revealed that lack of parental supervision, parental employment, authoritarian style of parenting and lack of open discussion with adolescents contributed to drug abuse as well as most parents do not take active roles in schools. The study further revealed that not residing with the biological parents was not significantly associated with drug abuse. This was contrary to the view held by most scholars that the adolescents who do not reside with their biological parents were prone to drug abuse. To avoid drug abuse, parental monitoring should be given to all children regardless of the birth order, absence of aggression at home, parental quality time, open discussions with adolescents, authoritative parenting and parental involvement in school activities. Majority of the children born after the first child portrayed antisocial behaviours; hence the further the birth position in the family the higher the engagement in drug abuse Based on these findings, there is need to give all children as much supervision as that given to the first born children. Thus, the schools should organise sessions for parents and educate them on effective ways of parenting adolescents. Parents need to be encouraged to take active role in schools. Therefore, schools must create partnerships by providing an open and accommodative environment with their wider community. This would help in forming a link between the school and the home as well as the school and the family.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Contributions of Selected Family Factors to Drug Abuse Among Adolescents in Secondary Schools in Manyatta Sub-county, Embu County, Kenya AU - Milcah Njoki Nyaga AU - Kimu Mwai Y1 - 2016/03/01 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 19 EP - 26 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160402.11 AB - The aim of this research is to investigate the contributions of selected family factors to drug abuse among adolescents in Kenyan secondary schools. To achieve this, the study sought to investigate the role of parental monitoring, residence, employment and parenting behaviours in predisposing the adolescent in the development to drug use. In addition, the study established the significance of associations between family factors and drug abuse among adolescents. The data were collected from form two students and deputy principals in secondary schools. The findings revealed that lack of parental supervision, parental employment, authoritarian style of parenting and lack of open discussion with adolescents contributed to drug abuse as well as most parents do not take active roles in schools. The study further revealed that not residing with the biological parents was not significantly associated with drug abuse. This was contrary to the view held by most scholars that the adolescents who do not reside with their biological parents were prone to drug abuse. To avoid drug abuse, parental monitoring should be given to all children regardless of the birth order, absence of aggression at home, parental quality time, open discussions with adolescents, authoritative parenting and parental involvement in school activities. Majority of the children born after the first child portrayed antisocial behaviours; hence the further the birth position in the family the higher the engagement in drug abuse Based on these findings, there is need to give all children as much supervision as that given to the first born children. Thus, the schools should organise sessions for parents and educate them on effective ways of parenting adolescents. Parents need to be encouraged to take active role in schools. Therefore, schools must create partnerships by providing an open and accommodative environment with their wider community. This would help in forming a link between the school and the home as well as the school and the family. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -