The study combining with elements of descriptive and explanatory research based on 180 respondents reports on what corporate social responsibility (CSR) is to the consumers, and the value they derive from it. Research finds that consumers clearly derive social, emotional and functional value from CSR. The research is inconclusive, and it is arguable whether CSR policy has any influence on their buying decision. However, consumers report another type of value, i.e., egocentric value that needs to be considered in future research for validation.
Published in | Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12 |
Page(s) | 71-76 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Consumer Values, Consumer Perceptions, Social Responsibility
[1] | Craps, M (2012). CSR theories [Power Point slides]. Retrieved from www.hubwise.be also see Craps, M. (2012). Introduction to CSR [Power Point slides]. Retrieved from www.hubwise.be, Accessed on February 22, 2015 |
[2] | Post, J. E., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S.(2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stake holder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28. |
[3] | Carroll, A.B.(2001).The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4),pp.39-48. |
[4] | Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21stcentury business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited. |
[5] | Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review,2 (3),70-76. |
[6] | Davis, K.(1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2),312-322. |
[7] | Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R.L. (1971).Business, society, and environment: social power and social response. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
[8] | Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2011).Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89 (1),62-77. |
[9] | Buhr, H., & Grafström, M. (2007). The making of meaning in the media: The case of corporate social responsibility in the Financial Times. In F.den Hond, F.G.de Bakker, & P. Neergaard (Eds.). Managing corporate social responsibility in action: Talking, doing and measuring (pp.15-32). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited |
[10] | Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly,48 (2), 268-305 |
[11] | Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256. |
[12] | Friedman, M. (1970).The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.1-6 |
[13] | Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). Investing in CSR to enhance customer value. Director Notes of the Conference Board,3(3),1- 10.Retrievedfromhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1843308, Accessed on February 25 |
[14] | Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. |
[15] | IBM (2008), Attaining sustainable growth through corporate social responsibility, Retrieved from www-304.ibm.com/easyaccess/fileserve?contentid=131474 on March 12, 2015 |
[16] | Reputation Institute (2014), Global CSR Rep Trak®Ranking, http://www.reputationinstitute.com/about-reputation-institute/the-reptrak-framework, Accessed on March 17, 2015 |
[17] | Mohr, L. A., Webb, D.J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72. |
[18] | Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap, Journal of Communication Management, 4(4),pp.1-22. |
[19] | Green, T., & Peloza, J.(2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1),48-56 |
[20] | Bhattacharya, C.B., & Sen, S.(2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1),9-4. |
[21] | CII, (2013), Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility in India, www.pwc.in, Accessed on February 12, 2015. Also read India’s New Corporate Social Responsibility Requirements – Beware of the Pitfalls, April 2014, http://www.jonesday.com/Indias-New-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Requirements--Beware-of-the-Pitfalls-04-15-2014/ |
[22] | Kompella Kartikeya, (2011), CSR: Cause-related branding can help balance business with marketing, December 1, 2011, http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/corporate-social-responsibility-business-marketing-balance/1/20574.html, accessed on February 10, 2015 |
[23] | Dahlsrud, A. (2008), How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 15(1), 1-13. |
[24] | Panda, A., Kumar, B. (2015), Factors Determining Retail Customer Satisfaction: A Study of Organised Retail Outlets in an Indian Capital City, International Journal of Management and Development Studies, Volume No. 4 (2015), Isuue No. 1, January, 92-101 |
APA Style
Basanta Kumar, Anjali Panda, Brajaraj Mohanty. (2015). CSR Value for Consumers: Indian Perspectives. Science Journal of Business and Management, 3(3), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12
ACS Style
Basanta Kumar; Anjali Panda; Brajaraj Mohanty. CSR Value for Consumers: Indian Perspectives. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3(3), 71-76. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12
AMA Style
Basanta Kumar, Anjali Panda, Brajaraj Mohanty. CSR Value for Consumers: Indian Perspectives. Sci J Bus Manag. 2015;3(3):71-76. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12
@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12, author = {Basanta Kumar and Anjali Panda and Brajaraj Mohanty}, title = {CSR Value for Consumers: Indian Perspectives}, journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {71-76}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20150303.12}, abstract = {The study combining with elements of descriptive and explanatory research based on 180 respondents reports on what corporate social responsibility (CSR) is to the consumers, and the value they derive from it. Research finds that consumers clearly derive social, emotional and functional value from CSR. The research is inconclusive, and it is arguable whether CSR policy has any influence on their buying decision. However, consumers report another type of value, i.e., egocentric value that needs to be considered in future research for validation.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - CSR Value for Consumers: Indian Perspectives AU - Basanta Kumar AU - Anjali Panda AU - Brajaraj Mohanty Y1 - 2015/05/26 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12 T2 - Science Journal of Business and Management JF - Science Journal of Business and Management JO - Science Journal of Business and Management SP - 71 EP - 76 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0634 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20150303.12 AB - The study combining with elements of descriptive and explanatory research based on 180 respondents reports on what corporate social responsibility (CSR) is to the consumers, and the value they derive from it. Research finds that consumers clearly derive social, emotional and functional value from CSR. The research is inconclusive, and it is arguable whether CSR policy has any influence on their buying decision. However, consumers report another type of value, i.e., egocentric value that needs to be considered in future research for validation. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -