Currently the present-time value of the Hubble constant is estimated through finding the optimum fit to the observationally measured data. Here, assuming a flat universe with zero cosmological constant, based on the conservation of total mass-energy and a correction for the effect of time dilation, the total present-time value of the energy density parameter is found to be equal to 0.703091. Based on the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) equation, the first law of thermodynamics, and Einstein’s Equivalence Principle, we present an analytical approach which yields a value for the Hubble constant equal to H_0=69.05398 km s^(-1) 〖Mpc〗^(-1). Using this value, Hubble diagrams are constructed. These diagrams are remarkably consistent with the available observational data.
Published in | American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13 |
Page(s) | 44-49 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hubble Constant, Density Parameter, Distances and Redshift, Expanding Universe
[1] | E. Hubble, “A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 15:3, 168-173 (1929). http://www.pnas.org/content/15/3/168 |
[2] | L. Wendy, W. L. Freedman, F. B. Madore, “ The Hubble Constant,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 48:673-710, (2010). |
[3] | Tammann, G. A. (2005) “The Ups and Downs of the Hubble Constant,” arXiv:astro-ph/0512584v1, Reviews in Modern Astronomy, Volume 19, pp. 1-29, (2008). |
[4] | N. Falcon, A. Aguirre, “Theoretical Deduction of the Hubble Law Beginning with a MoND Theory in Context of the ΛFRW-Cosmology,” International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4, pp. 551-559, (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2014.44051 |
[5] | D. Larson, J. Dunkley, G. Hinshaw, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, C. L. Bennett, et al., “Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Sky Maps, Systematic Errors, and Basic Results,” Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 192:16, pp. 1-19 (2011). |
[6] | P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. I. R. Alves, C. , Armitage-Caplan, M. Amaud, M. Ashdown, et al., “Planck 2013 Results, I. Overview of Products and Scientific Results,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5062 v2, pp. 1-49 (2013). |
[7] | C. L. Bennett, D. Larson, J. L. Weiland, N. Jarosik, G. Hinshaw, N. Odegard, et al., “Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Maps and Results,” Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 208:20, pp. 1-54 (2013). |
[8] | M. J. Reid, J. A. Braatz, J. J. Condon, K. Y. Lo, C. Y. Kuo, C. M. V. Impellizzeri, et al. “The Megamaser Cosmology Project IV. A Direct Measurement of the Hubble Constant From UGC 3789,” Astrophysical Journal, 767:154, pp. 1-11, (2013). |
[9] | J. A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 75-77. |
[10] | C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1973, pp. 726-728. |
[11] | A. G. Riess, “Nobel Lecture: My Path to the Accelerating Universe,” Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 84, pp. 1165-1175, (2012). |
[12] | B. P. Schmidt, “Nobel Lecture: Accelerating Expansion of the Universe through Observation of Distant Supernovae,” Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 84, pp. 1151-1163, (2012). |
[13] | S. Perlmutter, “Nobel Lecture: Measuring the Acceleration of the Cosmic Expansion Using Supernovae,” Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 84, pp. 1127-1149, (2012). |
[14] | S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R. A. Knop, P. Nugent, P. G. Castro, et al. “Measurements of Ω and Λ From 42 High-Redshift Supernovae,” The Astrophysical Journal, 517:565-586, (1999). |
[15] | P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology, Princeton University Press1993, pp. 321. |
[16] | R. Amanullah, C. Lidman, D. Rubin, G. Aldering, P. Astier, K. Barbary, et al., “ Spectra and Hubble Space Telescope Light Curves of Six Types Ia Supernovae at 0.511< z <1.12 and the Union2 Compilation,” The Astrophysical Journal, 716:712-738, (2010), data available at http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union/figur...n2_mu_vs_z.txt |
[17] | B. F. Mador, I. P. Steer, “NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database Master List of Galaxy Distances,” NED-4D, (2008). http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/NED4D/ |
APA Style
Naser Mostaghel. (2015). An Analytical Estimate of the Hubble Constant. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3(3), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13
ACS Style
Naser Mostaghel. An Analytical Estimate of the Hubble Constant. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 3(3), 44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13
AMA Style
Naser Mostaghel. An Analytical Estimate of the Hubble Constant. Am J Astron Astrophys. 2015;3(3):44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13, author = {Naser Mostaghel}, title = {An Analytical Estimate of the Hubble Constant}, journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {44-49}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20150303.13}, abstract = {Currently the present-time value of the Hubble constant is estimated through finding the optimum fit to the observationally measured data. Here, assuming a flat universe with zero cosmological constant, based on the conservation of total mass-energy and a correction for the effect of time dilation, the total present-time value of the energy density parameter is found to be equal to 0.703091. Based on the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) equation, the first law of thermodynamics, and Einstein’s Equivalence Principle, we present an analytical approach which yields a value for the Hubble constant equal to H_0=69.05398 km s^(-1) 〖Mpc〗^(-1). Using this value, Hubble diagrams are constructed. These diagrams are remarkably consistent with the available observational data.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Analytical Estimate of the Hubble Constant AU - Naser Mostaghel Y1 - 2015/04/27 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13 T2 - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics JF - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics JO - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics SP - 44 EP - 49 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-4686 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20150303.13 AB - Currently the present-time value of the Hubble constant is estimated through finding the optimum fit to the observationally measured data. Here, assuming a flat universe with zero cosmological constant, based on the conservation of total mass-energy and a correction for the effect of time dilation, the total present-time value of the energy density parameter is found to be equal to 0.703091. Based on the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) equation, the first law of thermodynamics, and Einstein’s Equivalence Principle, we present an analytical approach which yields a value for the Hubble constant equal to H_0=69.05398 km s^(-1) 〖Mpc〗^(-1). Using this value, Hubble diagrams are constructed. These diagrams are remarkably consistent with the available observational data. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -